Showing posts with label episodic migraine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label episodic migraine. Show all posts

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Treating and Preventing Migraines: Episodic vs Chronic New Article in Headache March 2015 Describes Barries to Optimal Treatment and Prevention

There is a new article " 2015 Mar;55 Suppl 2:103-22. doi: 10.1111/head.12505_2.

Episodic and chronic migraine headache: breaking down barriers to optimal treatment and prevention." in Headache that describes the problems in finding optimal treatment.


In my experience the diagnosis of episodic or chronic migraine can actually harm the patient.  As headaches are classified it then limits the treatments that physicians offer.  I frequently find that wrong assumptions as to the cause of headaches is often the largest deterrent to successful treatment.  
The following video is a patient with severe headache that was relieved in just a few minutes time with Ttrigger Point Injections and muscle stretch.  The orgin was Myofascial Pain but the symptom was headache or migraine. When I saw this patient the first time she had been in constant excruciating pain for every minute of every day for 22 years.

Watch the video and then go www.thinkbetterlife.com testimonial page to see her first video. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VA-amBnd8A

According to the article there are only five strategies for preventing episodic migraine and one  for preventing chronic migraine.  This fact is based on the idea that drug therapy is the method of preventing migraines.   " Five US Food and Drug Association strategies are approved for preventing episodic migraine, but only injections with onabotulinumtoxinA are approved for preventing chronic migraine. Identifying persons who require migraine prophylaxis and selecting and initiating the most appropriate treatment strategy may prevent progression from episodic to chronic migraine and alleviate the pain and suffering associated with frequent migraine. "


5.
 2015 Mar;55 Suppl 2:103-22. doi: 10.1111/head.12505_2.

Episodic and chronic migraine headache: breaking down barriers to optimal treatment and prevention.

Abstract

Migraine is a common disabling primary headache disorder that affects an estimated 36 million Americans. Migraine headaches often occur over many years or over an individual's lifetime. By definition, episodic migraine is characterized by headaches that occur on fewer than 15 days per month. According to the recent International Classification of Headache Disorders (third revision) beta diagnostic criteria, chronic migraine is defined as "headaches on at least 15 days per month for at least 3 months, with the features of migraine on at least 8 days per month." However, diagnostic criteria distinguishing episodic from chronic migraine continue to evolve. Persons with episodic migraine can remit, not change, or progress to high-frequency episodic or chronic migraine over time. Chronic migraine is associated with a substantially greater personal and societal burden, more frequent comorbidities, and possibly with persistent and progressive brain abnormalities. Many patients are poorly responsive to, or noncompliant with, conventional preventive therapies. The primary goals of migraine treatment include relieving pain, restoring function, and reducing headache frequency; an additional goal may be preventing progression to chronic migraine. Although all migraineurs require abortive treatment, and all patients with chronic migraine require preventive treatment, there are no definitive guidelines delineating which persons with episodic migraine would benefit from preventive therapy. Five US Food and Drug Association strategies are approved for preventing episodic migraine, but only injections with onabotulinumtoxinA are approved for preventing chronic migraine. Identifying persons who require migraine prophylaxis and selecting and initiating the most appropriate treatment strategy may prevent progression from episodic to chronic migraine and alleviate the pain and suffering associated with frequent migraine. 
© 2015 American Headache Society.

KEYWORDS: 

chronic migraine; diagnosis; episodic migraine; iontophoretic transdermal system; onabotulinumtoxinA injection; treatment
PMID:
 
25662743
 
[PubMed - in process]

Sunday, November 27, 2011

New Report in Journal Headache on Chronic and Episodic Migraine.

This new report in Headache. 2011 Nov 22 looks at differences between Chronic Migraine (More than 15 headache days/month) compared to Episodic Migraine (less than 15 headache days/month) The study found that "those with Chronic Migraine were significantly more likely to experience "severe" headache impact (72.9% vs 42.3%) and had higher odds of greater adverse headache impact compared with persons with Episodic Migraine.

The study found that "Significant predictors of adverse headache impact in both groups included younger age, higher MSS (migraine symptom severity) score, higher average long-duration headache pain severity rating, and depression."

"Lower annual household income, anxiety, and higher standardized headache day frequency predicted adverse headache impact in Episodic Migraine but not in Chronic Migraine."

Not surprising, rates of depression were more than double among persons with Chronic Migraine compared to Episodic Migraine and rates of anxiety were nearly triple in the Chronic Migraine group.

When patients are treated with a diagnostic neuromuscular orthotic it is common to see changes in personality and temperament as the pain is reduced or eliminated. I have often found that I don't "meet" the patient till the second, third or fourth visit because they were "lost" in their pain. As the pain dissipates you actually meet the real person, not the one at the effect of constant pain.

This study (PubMed abstract below) describes Chronic Migraine as more than 15 days of headache while episodic is less than 15. In my experience both of these groups actually are in constant pain but they describe lower levels of pain as feeling good. When patients are feeling better they can be more objective about how bad they really felt prior.

It is essential to understand that the depression and anxiety are somatopsychic effects of being in constant pain. Dpression is a "normal" response to constant pain.

Headache. 2011 Nov 22. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02046.x. [Epub ahead of print]

Headache Impact of Chronic and Episodic Migraine: Results From the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study.

Source

From Montefiore Headache Center, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA (D. Buse); Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA (D. Buse and R. Lipton); Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA (A. Manack, S. Varon, and C. Turkel); Clinical Research, Vedanta Research, Chapel Hill, CA, USA (D. Serrano and M. Reed).

Abstract

Background.- The Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measure that assesses the impact of headaches on the lives of persons with migraine. Originally used in studies of episodic migraine (EM), HIT-6 is finding increasing applications in chronic migraine (CM) research. Objectives.- (1) To examine the headache-impact on persons with migraine (EM and CM) using HIT-6 in a large population sample; (2) to identify predictors of headache-impact in this sample; (3) to assess the magnitude of effect for significant predictors of headache-impact in this sample. Methods.- The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study is a longitudinal, population-based study that collected data from persons with severe headache from 2004 to 2009 through annual, mailed surveys. Respondents to the 2009 survey who met International Classification of Headache Disorders 2 criteria for migraine reported at least 1 headache in the preceding year, and completed the HIT-6 questionnaire were included in the present analysis. Persons with migraine were categorized as EM (average <15 headache days per month) or CM (average ≥15 headache days per month). Predictors of headache-impact examined include: sociodemographics; headache days per month; a composite migraine symptom severity score (MSS); an average pain severity rating during the most recent long-duration headache; depression; and anxiety. HIT-6 scores were analyzed both as continuous sum scores and using the standard, validated categories: no impact; some impact; substantial impact; and severe impact. Group contrasts were based on descriptive statistics along with linear regression models. Multiple imputation techniques were used to manage missing data. Results.- There were 7169 eligible respondents (CM = 373, EM = 6554). HIT-6 scores were normally distributed. After converting sum HIT-6 scores to the standard categories, those with CM were significantly more likely to experience "severe" headache impact (72.9% vs 42.3%) and had higher odds of greater adverse headache impact compared with persons with EM (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 2.77-4.41, P < .0001). Significant predictors of adverse headache impact in both groups included younger age, higher MSS score, higher average long-duration headache pain severity rating, and depression. Lower annual household income, anxiety, and higher standardized headache day frequency predicted adverse headache impact in EM but not CM. With few exceptions, gender, race, and body mass index did not significantly predict adverse headache impact. Finally, rates of depression were more than double among persons with CM (CM = 25.2%, EM = 10.0%), and rates of anxiety were nearly triple (CM = 23.6%, EM = 8.5%). Conclusions.- This work further establishes HIT-6 as a useful instrument for characterizing CM and understanding the increased disease related burden. Persons with CM had significantly higher odds of greater adverse headache impact, when compared with EM. Predictors of greater headache impact for both groups included higher MSS scores, higher average headache pain severity, and depression. Additional predictors unique to EM included higher average household income, younger age, higher standardized headache day frequency, and anxiety. This finding may be related to differences in sample size and power. Further exploration is warranted.

© 2011 American Headache Society.