Facial Pain, Normal Sinus CT scans, Headache, Migraine and TMD

An older study in the Laryngescope is on 104 patients with facial pain who had normal CT scans. Twenty nine of the patients had previous unsuccessful sinus surgery. The patients were approximately 80% women, TMJ disorders are usually (80%) found in female patients.

The study showed " Four percent of patients seen by a neurologist had an unsuspected serious intracranial diagnosis." It is essential that organic neurologic causes are ruled out but the 100 remaining patients had headaches of undetermined causes. Facial pain and sinus pain are a alert for MPD (myofascial pain) and TMD (temporomandibular pain). Treatment of patients with chronic headaches, migraines sinus and/or facial pain is frequently done without a neuromuscular dental evaluation even though NMD has extremely high success rates.

The Trigeminal nerve innervates the sinus cavities. It is often called the Dentist's nerve because the trigeminal nerve primarily goes to the teeth, jaw muscles, jaw joints, periodontal ligaments and is responsible in full or part for most headaches. It also controls blood flow to the anterior 2/3 of the brain thru the meninges.

Correction of underlying neuromuscular problems often allows drug free effective treatment. When CT scans are normal patients with sinus pain and facial pain should always be evaluated by a neuromuscular dentist. Neurologists should evaluate all patients with organic brain disorders but functional treatment is preferred to heavy drug therapy for the majority of patients.

Frequently Chiropracters and dentists can get miraculous results by working together especially NUCCA and A/O (Atlas Orthogonal) chiropracters. The Dentists can correct nociceptive trigeminal nerve input while the chiropracters correct cervical and head posture. Long term correction of those problems usually requires correction of descending conditions associated with improper jaw function.



Laryngoscope. 2004 Nov;114(11):1992-6.
Neurologic diagnosis and treatment in patients with computed tomography and nasal endoscopy negative facial pain.
Paulson EP, Graham SM.

Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1093, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the helpfulness of specialist neurology referral for patients with facial pain, a normal sinus computed tomography (CT) scan, and normal nasal endoscopy findings.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective identification of patients and analysis of data approved by the Institutional Review Board.

METHODS: The data of 104 consecutive patients presenting with facial pain, a normal sinus CT scan, and normal nasal endoscopy findings were reviewed. The patients presented to a single rhinologist in a tertiary care institution. All patients were referred for specialist neurologic evaluation and potential treatment. Further information was obtained from a patient survey.

RESULTS: Of the 104 patients, 81 were women and 23 were men. The average age was 46 years (range, 22-85). Fifty-six had clear CT scans, 48 had minimal change, and all had negative endoscopies. Twenty-nine had previous unsuccessful sinus surgery. The average follow-up period was 10.5 months. Forty of 75 patients seeing a neurologist were seen on multiple occasions. Four percent of patients seen by a neurologist had an unsuspected serious intracranial diagnosis. The most common diagnoses were migraine (37%), rebound headache (17%), chronic daily headache (17%), and obstructive sleep apnea (16%). Overall, 58% improved on medical therapy; 60% of those with a clear CT scan improved, and 53% of those with minimal change on CT scan improved (P = .749).

CONCLUSIONS: Facial pain remains a difficult symptom to diagnose and treat in rhinologic practice. Patients often undergo surgery without help. Most patients with facial pain, a normal sinus CT scan, and normal endoscopy findings benefit from neurologic consultation. Serious intracranial pathologic conditions can be excluded and diagnosis-specific pharmacogenetic therapy instituted with improvement in more than 50%.

PMID: 15510029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Migraine perspectives from Neurologists who suffer from Migraines

This is an interesting abstract on how Neurologists in France view Migraine.

I was surprised that the views of neurologists who suffered from migraine were similar to those who di not. The most common rugs used were anti-inflamatories (1) and Triptans (2). The article stated that migraine patients are usually undertreated. What would have been most interesting would be the differences in treatments of neurologists with migraine versus those without. While their attitudes were similar the article did not seperate treatment methods. There may also be a reporting bias by neurologists who do not admit (illegal) self treatments.

Headache. 2010 Apr 16. [Epub ahead of print]
Migraine and Migraines of Specialists: Perceptions and Management.
Donnet A, Becker H, Allaf B, Lantéri-Minet M.

From the Neurology Department, Hôpital la Timone, Marseille, France (A. Donnet); Les Anémones Medical Centre, Cannes, France (H. Becker); Almirall SAS, Paris, France (B. Allaf); INSERM U929, Department of Evaluation and Treatment of Pain, Clinical Neurosciences Pole, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France (M. Lantéri-Minet).
Abstract
(Headache 2010;**:**-**) Objectives.- To describe the perception of migraine by neurologists in France, to compare perceptions between neurologists who did and did not suffer from migraines and to describe treatments used for their own migraines. Background.- Patients with migraine are usually undertreated, as treatment guidelines are frequently not followed and, therefore, resulting treatment satisfaction is low. One reason for this may be inappropriate perceptions of physicians concerning the seriousness of the pathology and the need to treat. However, available information on physician perceptions of migraine is limited. Methods.- This was an observational, epidemiological survey conducted both in hospital- and community-based neurologists in France. Participating neurologists completed an anonymous questionnaire which collected data on demographics, migraine status, and perceptions of migraine. Neurologists who considered themselves migraineurs also provided data on migraine impact, treatment and on treatment satisfaction. Distributions of responses to questions on migraine perceptions were compared between migraineur and nonmigraineur neurologists. Results.- The study included 368 neurologists, of whom 179 (48.6%) were migraineurs themselves. Some 92.3% of participants claimed to be very or quite interested in migraine. Migraine was considered a real illness by 96.5% of neurologists and to be very or quite disabling by 96.6%. Around half perceived migraine as a challenging condition to manage with respect to unrealistic patient expectations (46.2%), time-consuming treatment (48.9%), and complications because of anxious or depressive comorbidity (59.9%) or medical nomadism (consulting multiple physicians for the same condition; 47.0%). No significant differences in any perception items were observed between migraineur and nonmigraineur neurologists. In total, 83.1% of neurologists were satisfied with acute headache treatments and 60.4% with prophylactic headache treatments. The most frequently reported treatments for neurologist's own migraines were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (used by 57.0%) and triptans (50.3%). Conclusions.- French neurologists are interested and concerned about migraine but find it challenging to treat. Migraine perceptions do not differ between neurologists who do and do not suffer from migraines themselves. Neurology training needs to prepare medical students adequately for the challenges of migraine treatment in terms of patient communication and psychiatric issues.

PMID: 20408886 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]